Oregon RTW Incentives: Employer-at-Injury Program and Preferred Worker Program

What Oregon's Two RTW Incentives Are Solving For

A warehouse coordinator in Portland gets an attending physician's report on a forklift operator — partial weight-bearing restriction, six-week horizon, light-duty approval pending. The coordinator's instinct is to hold the position open and wait. The instinct is understandable and expensive. Every week that worker is fully off duty, the employer absorbs the full cost of replacement labor on top of indemnity drag, and the claim's exposure window grows.

Oregon built two complementary programs to change that calculation. The Employer-at-Injury Program (EAIP) reimburses the original employer for bringing an injured worker back to transitional light duty before full recovery. The Preferred Worker Program (PWP) picks up where EAIP leaves off, providing separate incentives when a worker carries a permanent work restriction that prevents return to the original job. Used together, they represent a material financial return for employers who document and manage the process correctly.

This article explains how each program works, what it reimburses, what documentation is required to qualify, where the two programs connect and differ, and what a coordinator needs to track to protect eligibility. Confirm all current form versions, thresholds, and effective dates with the Oregon Workers' Compensation Division (OR WCD) before submitting any application. Program parameters can change by legislative or administrative action; the figures cited here carry the source year shown.

---

The Employer-at-Injury Program: Parameters and Eligibility

The Oregon Employer-at-Injury Program is administered by OR WCD and funded through the Workers' Benefit Fund — a separate assessment pool that does not affect the employer's individual premium or claim costs. That funding structure is significant: EAIP reimbursements are not drawn from the employer's policy. Participating in EAIP has no direct adverse effect on the employer's experience modification rate through the program itself.

What EAIP Reimburses

EAIP repays 50% of the worker's early return-to-work gross wages for up to 66 work days within a consecutive 24-month period. (OR WCD, 2025.) The work days do not need to be consecutive; the 66-day ceiling accumulates across however many days the worker actually performs approved transitional work within that 24-month window.

The program also reimburses worksite modification costs and the cost of tools or equipment required to accommodate the worker's restrictions, subject to a $5,000 combined cap across both categories. (OR WCD, 2024.) A worksite modification might be a temporary ergonomic workstation, a ramp, or modified tooling — anything documented as necessary to perform the transitional job within the worker's restrictions. The $5,000 cap covers modifications and tools together, not separately.

There is a one-time program administrative fee of $120 per EAIP enrollment. (OR WCD, 2025.) Confirm with OR WCD whether this fee applies per program period, per claim, or per worker enrollment.

Who Is Eligible to Participate

The original employer — the employer at the time of injury — applies for EAIP. The worker must have an accepted workers' compensation claim. The attending physician must authorize the transitional work assignment, and the work offered must fall within the restrictions the physician has approved. Oregon law does not allow an employer to place a worker in a modified assignment that exceeds the physician's stated restrictions and then claim EAIP reimbursement for those days.

The employer cannot claim EAIP reimbursement for wages paid on days where the assignment exceeded the approved scope. This mirrors the eligibility discipline in Washington's Stay-at-Work program, where a day worked outside the approved job description or approved hours is ineligible. Oregon coordinators should treat the attending physician's written authorization as the outer boundary of every reimbursable day.

The Application Mechanics

The EAIP reimbursement request is submitted to the Workers' Benefit Fund by the insurer, typically on Form 2360 (the EAIP Reimbursement Request). Form 3245 — the attending physician's Return-to-Work Status form — is the medical work-release document that underpins EAIP eligibility, not the reimbursement application itself; the two are often confused. Confirm the current form numbers and versions with OR WCD before filing, as they change.

The employer submits the application to OR WCD, not to the insurer or the managed care organization. The application must document: the transitional job description, the physician's written authorization of that job description, the dates worked, and the wages paid. Payroll records supporting the wage figures are required.

Applications must be submitted within a defined window after the light-duty work is completed. Confirm the current filing deadline with OR WCD — the verified-data library does not specify an Oregon application deadline, and submitting late forfeits the reimbursement with no recourse.

---

The Preferred Worker Program: When a Permanent Restriction Changes the Picture

The Preferred Worker Program applies when an injured worker's claim produces a permanent work restriction — a restriction the attending physician determines is lasting, not temporary — that prevents the worker from returning to the original position. At that point, the employer faces a different set of decisions: can the original employer restructure a position to accommodate the permanent restriction, or does the worker need to find work elsewhere?

Oregon created PWP to incentivize either outcome. The original employer can apply for PWP benefits to help retain a Preferred Worker. Alternatively, a new employer who hires a Preferred Worker — someone who holds a current Preferred Worker card issued by OR WCD — can access a separate, parallel set of benefits.

What PWP Covers

The Preferred Worker Program provides several categories of benefit to qualifying employers. The verified-data library does not contain the specific dollar figures, duration limits, or wage-subsidy rates for PWP — those parameters are held qualitatively here, and you should confirm the current values directly with OR WCD before making any program decision. At a general level, PWP benefits can include:

• Wage subsidy for the employer during a transitional period after placing a Preferred Worker in modified or new work
• Worksite modification reimbursement for physical changes required to accommodate the permanent restriction
• Tools and equipment reimbursement for items the Preferred Worker needs that a non-injured worker in the same role would not
• Training costs in some circumstances, where the permanent restriction requires a worker to be redirected to a new occupation

The funding mechanism is the same as EAIP — the Workers' Benefit Fund — so PWP participation also carries no direct effect on the employer's premium experience through the program itself.

The Preferred Worker Card

A worker qualifies for PWP status when a physician determines a permanent restriction and the restriction is documented in the claim record. OR WCD issues a Preferred Worker card, which the worker carries. An employer hiring a cardholder can access PWP benefits by applying to OR WCD. The card has a defined validity period — confirm the current duration with OR WCD.

An employer considering hiring a Preferred Worker should request the card before the placement decision and confirm the worker's current restriction profile with the attending or consulting physician. PWP benefits are employer-facing; the worker does not apply on their own behalf.

---

How EAIP and PWP Work Together in a Claim Timeline

EAIP and PWP are sequential, not simultaneous. A single claim can generate eligibility under both programs, but at different stages.

Claim Phase	Program	Trigger
Worker has temporary restrictions; attending physician approves transitional duty	EAIP	Employer places worker in light duty within physician-approved limits
Attending physician declares permanent restrictions; worker cannot return to original job	PWP	Employer restructures a position or new employer hires the Preferred Worker

A coordinator managing a serious musculoskeletal claim — a warehouse picker with a lumbar injury, for example — may see the worker move through a 10–12 week EAIP period on restricted duty, then receive a permanent restriction finding. If the employer can restructure the position (reducing required lifting, rotating the worker to a less physical role), that modified placement potentially opens PWP eligibility for the subsequent period.

The practical implication: coordinators should not close the file when EAIP eligibility expires. They should flag the claim for a PWP eligibility review if the attending physician's notes suggest a permanent restriction is developing.

---

What Coordinators Must Document to Protect Eligibility

Oregon's two programs share a common documentation requirement: the attending physician's written authorization of the transitional job description. That document is both the gating condition for program eligibility and the primary defense in any audit or dispute over whether a reimbursed day was valid.

The Job Description Authorization Chain

1. Draft a written transitional job description that specifies the tasks the worker will perform, the physical demands of those tasks (lifting, standing, reaching, repetition), and the scheduled hours.
2. Submit the job description to the attending physician for review and written approval before the worker begins the assignment.
3. Obtain written authorization — a signed form, a letter, or a documented note in the physician's report — that approves the specific job description. Verbal authorization is not sufficient.
4. Do not modify the assignment beyond the authorized description without returning to the physician for updated written approval.
5. Record each day worked against the authorized description, including hours, tasks performed, and any deviations.

Any day on which the worker performed work outside the authorized scope — more hours, heavier loads, tasks not listed — is not reimbursable under EAIP. Unlike Washington's program (where a single disqualifying deviation can cost the entire day), confirm Oregon's specific rule with OR WCD. The principle of staying within the authorized scope applies regardless.

Payroll and Wage Records

EAIP reimburses 50% of gross wages. The application must be supported by payroll records that show gross wages paid for each reimbursable day. This means the coordinator's tracking system — whether a spreadsheet, a case management platform, or a dedicated RTW tool — must link each work day to a gross wage figure that matches what payroll actually processed.

A mismatch between the wage figures on the EAIP application and the payroll records is a common source of reimbursement delay. Run a payroll reconciliation before submitting the application, not after.

Worksite Modification and Equipment Receipts

For the $5,000 modification and equipment category, retain all invoices, purchase orders, and receipts. Document why each item was required — the restriction it accommodated — and connect it to the attending physician's restriction language. An invoice for an ergonomic chair is not self-documenting; the application needs to show the chair was required because of the physician's restriction on extended standing.

---

Interaction With Oregon Workers' Compensation Claim Management

EAIP and PWP operate on the employer side of the claim. The employer applies for reimbursement; the insurer manages the underlying indemnity and medical. Coordinators should notify their insurer or third-party administrator (TPA) that a transitional duty assignment is underway, because the assignment affects indemnity accrual — a worker on approved light duty within restrictions is typically not drawing lost-time indemnity for those days, which changes the claim's financials.

Oregon's claim closure rules and the attending physician's determination of maximum medical improvement (MMI) are separate from EAIP and PWP participation. Reaching MMI does not automatically terminate EAIP eligibility if the physician has not yet issued a permanent restriction finding. Confirm the interaction of MMI timing with EAIP eligibility directly with OR WCD and with claim counsel if any ambiguity exists.

The RTW research literature provides useful context on timing: approximately 50% of injured workers return to work within 30 days, and approximately 75% return within three months. (WCRI, 2018.) RTW likelihood drops materially — to approximately 50% — once a worker has been off work for 45 days. (RACP/AFOEM, 2010.) These figures suggest that the EAIP window, which begins with the injury event, is most valuable in the first weeks. A coordinator who waits for the worker to be fully recovered before initiating a transitional assignment may find the worker has already passed the point where RTW is most likely.

Early initiation of a documented transitional duty offer — before the 45-day mark — is the single highest-leverage operational decision in an EAIP-eligible claim.

---

The Claim's Financial Footprint Beyond EAIP and PWP

EAIP and PWP are direct reimbursements. The indirect financial effect of a successful RTW program operates through the experience modification rate (EMR). A lost-time claim carries full primary and excess loss into the EMR calculation; a medical-only claim has its primary loss value reduced by 70% — only 30% is applied. (National Workers Comp Authority, 2025.) An injured worker who returns to transitional duty before reaching the state's waiting period threshold — Oregon's specific day count should be confirmed with OR WCD, as waiting periods are state-dependent and the library does not specify Oregon's — may not cross into lost-time status at all.

Keeping a claim at medical-only status, where the clinical picture permits, is a significant EMR protection. The EAIP reimbursement is valuable on its own terms; the EMR protection from a successfully managed transitional duty placement compounds that value over the three-year experience window. (Higginbotham, 2026.)

---

Applying This to Your RTW Workflow

For an employer running five or more workers' compensation claims per year in Oregon, EAIP and PWP represent a repeatable reimbursement stream that is frequently left unclaimed because the documentation chain breaks down somewhere between the physician's office, the coordinator's desk, and the payroll system. The $5,000 modification cap and the 66-day / 50%-of-wages reimbursement structure are not trivial for a mid-sized operation; a single well-managed claim can recover costs that would otherwise sit as net claim expense.

The programs reward documentation discipline — the same discipline that a structured return-to-work case management process builds into every claim. For a comparison of how Oregon's programs sit alongside Washington's Stay-at-Work and Texas's Bona Fide Offer incentives, see the state RTW incentive programs overview and the state reimbursement programs hub.

If you are also managing claims in Washington, the Washington Stay-at-Work reimbursement guide covers that program's 50%-of-wages / 120-day / $25,000-per-claim structure. For Texas, the Texas Bona Fide Offer RTW guide covers the written-offer requirements under 28 TAC §129.6.

The Oregon RTW Incentives Pack in the store is a set of ready-to-use templates — transitional job description, physician authorization request, EAIP tracking log, and modification expense documentation — formatted to support an EAIP or PWP application. It is not a compliance guarantee and does not substitute for confirmation of current OR WCD requirements.

Download the Oregon RTW Incentives Pack (EAIP + PWP) →

Confirm all current program parameters, form versions, filing deadlines, and reimbursement limits with OR WCD and, where legal questions arise, with Oregon workers' compensation counsel before submitting any application.